Euthanasia Arguments Against Essay

Euthanasia Arguments Against Essay

… The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia,” Before he places his arguments he wants to disassociate from any myths and misconceptions of euthanasia. His definition, “euthanasia is that it involves taking a human life, either ones own or that of another. Also, the person whose life is taken must be someone who is believed to be suffering from some disease or injury from which recovery cannot reasonably be expected. Finally, the action must be deliberate and intentional.”
Gay-Williams makes three important arguments as to why euthanasia is inherently wrong. It points to the basic nature of all living things. This is …

… is inherently wrong. It points to the basic nature of all living things. This is the will to live. This will has guided evolution—the survival of the fittest. Every fiber of our being, even at the molecular level is designed for self-preservation. Williams avers that euthanasia goes against this basic tenet of nature. Williams invokes theological constructs. That God is the creator and has made man (and every thing else). Ergo, the life that Man wants to take does not really belong to Man. Euthanasia violates the sacred commandment about the sanctity and humanity of life. It is …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *