The underlying autonomy of the degree of lie suggested by Mr. Hughes lies on two broad scopes. This has basically been developed from his argument and dialogue between his great friend Westley over them seeing Jesus. Therefore, is Mr. Hughes guilty and disappointed of himself?
However, with his long attribute in such of God, Mr. Hughes is certainly disappointed over this nature of lie that he made. Seeing Jesus is never a reality. He has had a long tracking search for the faithfulness of God only be destroyed in this short lived piece of lie that he shared with his friend Westley.
From this action therefore, he ultimately destroyed his conscience that has ever been clean as shaped by his long search for God’s revelation. Lie is not good and especially when it comes to matters relating to the unseen God. Why should they lie? Jesus is the unseen God. He was therefore subjected to high levels of personal guiltiness when he found that he had been lying in the name of God (Seldess, 2008).
The Bible says that though shall not take the name of the Lord God in vain. However, Hughes and his friend Westley simply broke this commandment. This implies that his long efforts of searching for God’s truly came to an uncertain end from their attempt to lie in the name of the Lord.
This is also to imply that cheating is not good. It goes against the fundamental commandments of God. Either, it withdraws man far from God’s faithfulness. That is why Hughes faces threat of guilt over his conscience since he has done that which is wrong. We should not therefore lie otherwise we may subject our hearts to guiltiness and disappointments (Seldess, 2008).
Seldess, J. (2008). Narrative essay. Retrieved on 8th July 2009 from, http://www.writeexpress.com/narrative-essay.html